ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
John C. Vigil
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 29 | Number 3 | September 1967 | Pages 392-401
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE29-03-392
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method based on analytic continuation, which is well suited for fast digital computer application, has been applied to the point reactor kinetics equations. The most important characteristic of the method is that it yields an analytic criterion for the magnitude of the time step. This criterion is such that the time step automatically expands or contracts, depending on the behavior of the function within each interval. The use of this criterion to determine the time step guarantees that the fractional error in the results increases, at most, linearly with the number of time steps. Furthermore, the magnitude of the time step determined from this criterion can be much larger than the prompt-neutron generation time. Approximate solutions by this method were compared with some analytic solutions to the reactor kinetics equations, and the error accumulation was found, in all cases, to be within the limits predicted by the theory. Comparisons were also made with experimental transients in the Godiva and SPERT I reactors. The approximate results were found to agree well with experiment in the range of reactivity inputs where the feedback model used is valid. In a comparison with another numerical method (RTS code), analytic continuation was found to be 25 times faster.