ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Clifton R. Drumm, John C. Lee
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 96 | Number 1 | May 1987 | Pages 17-29
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE87-1
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The optimal axial distribution of gadolinium burnable poison in a pressurized water reactor is determined to yield an improved power distribution. The optimization scheme is based on Pontrya-gin’s maximum principle, with the objective function accounting for a target power distribution. The conjugate gradients optimization method is used to solve the resulting Euler-Lagrange equations iteratively, efficiently handling the high degree of nonlinearity of the problem. For the one-group, onedimensional axial core model considered, the optimal distribution of the number of burnable poison pins and gadolinium concentration yields an improved power distribution. For ten axial zones of gadolinium, the maximum power peaking factor for the cycle is reduced from 1.41 for uniform gadolinium to 1.23 for the optimal gadolinium loading, a decrease of 12.8%. The axial offset band is reduced from -12.0 to 6.5% for uniform gadolinium to -4.4 to 1.0% for the optimal gadolinium loading.