ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
Clifton R. Drumm, John C. Lee
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 96 | Number 1 | May 1987 | Pages 17-29
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE87-1
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The optimal axial distribution of gadolinium burnable poison in a pressurized water reactor is determined to yield an improved power distribution. The optimization scheme is based on Pontrya-gin’s maximum principle, with the objective function accounting for a target power distribution. The conjugate gradients optimization method is used to solve the resulting Euler-Lagrange equations iteratively, efficiently handling the high degree of nonlinearity of the problem. For the one-group, onedimensional axial core model considered, the optimal distribution of the number of burnable poison pins and gadolinium concentration yields an improved power distribution. For ten axial zones of gadolinium, the maximum power peaking factor for the cycle is reduced from 1.41 for uniform gadolinium to 1.23 for the optimal gadolinium loading, a decrease of 12.8%. The axial offset band is reduced from -12.0 to 6.5% for uniform gadolinium to -4.4 to 1.0% for the optimal gadolinium loading.