ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Jeremy A. Roberts, Bradley T. Rearden, Paul P. H. Wilson
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 173 | Number 1 | January 2013 | Pages 43-57
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE10-109
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents a method for determining partial biases and bias uncertainties for application in fission product burnup credit criticality safety analysis. The contribution of each nuclide to the overall system keff bias and the bias uncertainty are determined via the generalized linear least squares method. Where experimental benchmarks are available to validate specific nuclides, sensitivity and uncertainty analysis is used to project biases observed in the benchmarks to biases appropriate for the safety system. Two weighting schemes are proposed to produce an overall bias in the safety system from several single partial biases. Finally, these methods are used to determine partial biases for 149Sm and 103Rh from two experiment series and to apply these biases to a representative used fuel safety system. The biases obtained are compared to bounding estimates, and the sensitivity of the results to relevant assumptions is addressed.