ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Kazuyoshi Miki, Kotaro Inoue
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 59 | Number 2 | February 1976 | Pages 161-169
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A15686
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A new calculation code, the Hot Spot Probabilistic Evaluation Code (HOSPEC), is presented for evaluating hot-spot factors in a fast reactor. This code calculates the probability distribution of temperature in the whole core by means of a Monte Carlo method. Each Monte Carlo trial involves a complete thermal conduction analysis, thereby reducing errors due to assumptions in analytic procedures currently in use. With this code it is possible to determine the probability that fuel pellets, fuel pins, or subassemblies will exceed the limiting temperature, as well as determine the number of such “hot spots” that will develop. A quantitative comparison is made of the results obtained from this code with those from other analyses of a prototype fast reactor. The comparison has indicated, among other points, the following findings: 1. For zero hot spots, a conventional analytic evaluation code SHOSPA gives conservative results, i.e., ∼20°C at the fuel center, at a 3σ confidence level. 2. It is of crucial importance to take into account the temperature dependence of the properties of the materials. Neglecting such dependence leads to a much more conservative temperature prediction, e.g., ∼50°C at the fuel center.