ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
Kazuyoshi Miki, Kotaro Inoue
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 59 | Number 2 | February 1976 | Pages 161-169
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A15686
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A new calculation code, the Hot Spot Probabilistic Evaluation Code (HOSPEC), is presented for evaluating hot-spot factors in a fast reactor. This code calculates the probability distribution of temperature in the whole core by means of a Monte Carlo method. Each Monte Carlo trial involves a complete thermal conduction analysis, thereby reducing errors due to assumptions in analytic procedures currently in use. With this code it is possible to determine the probability that fuel pellets, fuel pins, or subassemblies will exceed the limiting temperature, as well as determine the number of such “hot spots” that will develop. A quantitative comparison is made of the results obtained from this code with those from other analyses of a prototype fast reactor. The comparison has indicated, among other points, the following findings: 1. For zero hot spots, a conventional analytic evaluation code SHOSPA gives conservative results, i.e., ∼20°C at the fuel center, at a 3σ confidence level. 2. It is of crucial importance to take into account the temperature dependence of the properties of the materials. Neglecting such dependence leads to a much more conservative temperature prediction, e.g., ∼50°C at the fuel center.