ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Breaking ground on a new approach to construction
The drive to Kairos Power’s reactor demonstration site in Oak Ridge, Tenn., is not only scenic—it’s historic. Nearly 85 years ago, roughly 30,000 construction workers transformed orchards and farmland into a key Manhattan Project site. Depending on your route, you may pass by one of the three gatehouses that were once military checkpoints controlling access to Atomic Energy Commission production facilities.
Theodore H. Smith, Burr H. Randolph
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 4 | Number 6 | December 1958 | Pages 762-784
doi.org/10.13182/NSE58-A15497
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Many factors influence the design of a containment structure: size and shape of the reactor and other equipment to be housed, topographic and subsurface features of the site, proximity to populated areas, relative economy of construction materials, need for access during operation, and most important, pressure-volume duty. For a given duty, and for geometrically similar structures, the volume can often be varied over a broad range with little change in total cost. The upper limiting volume is reached when external forces rather than internal govern the design; the lower limit is usually the point where the membrane becomes unreasonably thick. Two or more small vessels connected together may have advantages over one large vessel, but additional design problems arise in making them act as a unit. The merits of total versus partial containment are discussed. A comparison is made of the various designs studied in selecting the containment vessel for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station. These included simple and composite structures, some above and some below ground, some designed for total and some for partial containment. A steel sphere for partial containment was selected as best suiting the needs of this project.