ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
L. L. Carter, T. L. Miles, S. E. Binney
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 113 | Number 4 | April 1993 | Pages 324-338
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A15332
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Statistical uncertainties for neutron transport calculations using the Monte Carlo method are typically evaluated during the calculation by using the first and second moments of the tallies. There are concerns that these statistical uncertainties may be substantially nonconservative in some classes of problems, especially reactor eigenvalue problems with the additional complication of a generation-to-generation source. Optimization of the Monte Carlo random walks may introduce further nonconservatism. Calculations are reported that quantify the reliability of the uncertainty by comparing an ensemble of Monte Carlo predictions of means and uncertainties to the true means for a liquid-metal fast reactor. It was found that the number of samples falling beyond a 90% confidence limit interval was typically not far from the expected 10%. However, 2 samples out of ∼300 were beyond four standard deviations, while for a normal distribution there is <1 chance in 10 000 that a sample will be beyond four standard deviations.