ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
L. L. Carter, T. L. Miles, S. E. Binney
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 113 | Number 4 | April 1993 | Pages 324-338
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A15332
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Statistical uncertainties for neutron transport calculations using the Monte Carlo method are typically evaluated during the calculation by using the first and second moments of the tallies. There are concerns that these statistical uncertainties may be substantially nonconservative in some classes of problems, especially reactor eigenvalue problems with the additional complication of a generation-to-generation source. Optimization of the Monte Carlo random walks may introduce further nonconservatism. Calculations are reported that quantify the reliability of the uncertainty by comparing an ensemble of Monte Carlo predictions of means and uncertainties to the true means for a liquid-metal fast reactor. It was found that the number of samples falling beyond a 90% confidence limit interval was typically not far from the expected 10%. However, 2 samples out of ∼300 were beyond four standard deviations, while for a normal distribution there is <1 chance in 10 000 that a sample will be beyond four standard deviations.