ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuo Azekura, Tadahiro Ohnishi
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 62 | Number 4 | April 1977 | Pages 709-715
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-A15211
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An improved response matrix method has been proposed to effectively take into account the anisotropy of neutron angular distributions. The method utilizes a relation between the P0 and P1 components of a neutron angular distribution instead of calculating them independently. Hence the number of unknowns as well as computing time can be kept about the same as in the conventional response matrix method which adopts an isotropic approximation of a neutron angular distribution. The proposed method has been evaluated by applying it to one-dimensional slab and two-dimensional hexagonal systems. The results are quite promising: In comparison with the reference SN calculation, the difference of the neutron multiplication factor and power distribution is within 0.1% Δk/k and 2%, respectively, and furthermore, the computing time is reduced to below one-third.