ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
J. T. Mihalczo, V. K. Paré, G. L. Ragan, M. V. Mathis, G. C. Tillett
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 66 | Number 1 | April 1978 | Pages 29-59
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE78-A15186
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The theory of a method of determination of reactivity from power spectral density measurements with 252Cf and the results of experiments with a critical assembly mockup of a liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) and with uranium (93.2 wt% 235U) metal cylinders and a sphere are presented. This method of reactivity determination has an advantage over existing methods in that it determines the reactivity only from properties of the reactor at the subcritical state of interest and thus does not require a calibration near delayed criticality. In these experiments, the reactivity was varied by changing the fissile loading or the amount of neutron absorber inserted; for the LMFBR mockup, the reactivity varied to ∼75 dollars subcritical, and for the uranium metal assemblies to ∼30 dollars subcritical. These experiments verified for the first time the predictions of theory that could be tested in the measurements. This method has potential use in the fuel loading of reactors to determine the reactivity far subcritical before initial criticality is achieved. It has the advantage of not requiring a calibration at known reactivity by another method; furthermore, the interpretation of the measured data to obtain the reactivity does not depend on relative or absolute values of the source intensity or detection efficiency. It can also be used to determine the reactivity of assemblies where loading to criticality is undesirable or where sufficient material to achieve criticality is not available.