ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
DOE selects first companies for nuclear launch pad
The Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy and the National Reactor Innovation Center have announced their first selections for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad: three companies developing microreactors and one developing fuel supply.
The four companies—Deployable Energy, General Matter, NuCube Energy, and Radiant Industries—were selected from the initial pool of Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program applicants, the two precursor programs to the launch pad.
Madalina C. Badea, Dan G. Cacuci, Aurelian F. Badea
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 172 | Number 1 | September 2012 | Pages 1-19
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE11-10
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This work applies a recently developed best-estimate data assimilation and model calibration methodology to the three-dimensional reactor thermal-hydraulics simulation and design tool FLICA4. The experimental information used for calibrating FLICA4 parameters stems from the international Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Regulatory Commission boiling water reactor full-size fine-mesh bundle tests (BFBT) benchmarks, which were designed by the Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation of Japan for enabling systematic validation of simulation tools using full-scale experimental data. The following specific BFBT experiments have been used in this work for calibrating parameters and boundary conditions for FLICA4: (a) axial void fraction distributions and (b) transversal void fraction distributions. The resulting uncertainties for the predicted parameters and distributions of pressure drops and void fractions are shown to be smaller than the a priori experimental and computed uncertainties, thus demonstrating the successful calibration of a large-scale reactor core thermal-hydraulics code using the BFBT benchmark-grade experiments.