ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Uranium prices reach highest level since February 2024
The end-of-January spot price for uranium was $94.28 per pound, according to uranium fuel provider Cameco. That was the highest spot price posted by the company since the $95.00 per pound it listed at the end of February 2024. Spot prices during 2025 ranged from a low of $64.23 per pound at the end of March to a high of $82.63 per pound at the end of September.
Chuanxin Zhu, Yuan Chen, Yunfeng Mou, Pu Zheng, Tie He, Xinhua Wang, Li An, Haiping Guo
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 169 | Number 2 | October 2011 | Pages 188-197
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE10-35
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Measurements of (n, 2n) reaction cross sections to produce 84Rb, 86Rb, 88Y, 139Ce, 141Ce, 168Tm, 174m+gLu, 180mTa, 184m+gRe, 196n+gAu, and 237U were carried out in the range of 13.4 to 14.8 MeV. The samples were irradiated at various positions on the surface of a two-ring orientation instrument with a 20-cm radius centered at the deuterium-tritium neutron source. The 27Al(n,)24Na reaction was used to monitor the neutron fluence in the target samples. The neutron energies of different directions were determined using the ratio of 89Zr to 92mNb specific activities induced in Zr and Nb foils by (n, 2n) reactions. The (n, 2n) products were measured using a calibrated Ge detector. Experimental uncertainty was within ±4%. The results are presented and compared with the results of references and ENDF/B-VII.0 evaluations. Cross sections of 85Rb(n, 2n)84Rb, 140Ce(n, 2n)139Ce, and 89Y(n, 2n)88Y were in good agreement with those of ENDF/B-VII.0 evaluations; however, disagreements were observed for 175Lu(n, 2n)174Lu and 142Ce(n, 2n)141Ce between the present data and the ENDF/B-VII.0 evaluation file. The present data showed improvement in accuracy in comparison with previously reported data; therefore, the results should be offered for evaluations of neutron (n, 2n) cross sections.