ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Gov. Sherrill signs bill to begin nuclear procurement in N.J.
On July 13, New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill signed the Power NJ Act, a bill that directs the state’s Board of Public Utilities (BPU), in collaboration with the state’s Economic Development Authority, to establish an “advanced nuclear energy procurement program.”
Koichi Maki, Chikara Konno, Fujio Maekawa, Hiroshi Maekawa, Katsumi Hayashi, Kobun Yamada
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 36 | Number 1 | July 1999 | Pages 52-61
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/FST99-A91
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In traditional shielding design, thicknesses of shieldings have been determined so that calculated shielding properties multiplied by safety factors do not exceed design limits. A shielding design margin is defined for the safety factors that are included in the estimated shielding thicknesses in the design process. Sensitivities of the shielding design margin to the fusion reactor scale and amount of material are examined for a typical fusion experimental reactor such as the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). From these investigations, supposing the shielding design margin can be made smaller by up to half the typical value of 3 used in a reactor, the amount of toroidal coil, transformer coil, and other torus component materials can be reduced by 1.5, 0.7, and 0.7%, respectively. If one includes a reactor building and accessory facilities that are not affected by the shielding design margin, the whole reactor material reduction becomes 0.55%. Since reactor cost is assumed to be proportional to the amount of material, the 0.55% reduction may be worth $55 million when the estimated price of the reactor is assumed to be $10 billion.