ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DTRA’s advancements in nuclear and radiological detection
A new, more complex nuclear age has begun. Echoing the tensions of the Cold War amid rapidly evolving nuclear and radiological threats, preparedness in the modern age is a contest of scientific innovation. The Research and Development Directorate (RD) at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) is charged with winning this contest.
Kazuki Fukui, Yamato Fujii, Sota Araki, Rio Miyazawa, Indah Rosidah Maemunah, Ryohei Takehara, Shingo Tamaki, Sachie Kusaka, Fuminobu Sato, Isao Murata
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 82 | Number 4 | May 2026 | Pages 853-872
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2025.2507365
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The large-angle scattering reaction cross sections for materials relevant to the design of fusion reactors are not necessarily consistent between nuclear data libraries. The cross section must be known at large angles in order to accurately model scenarios such as neutron streaming. To confirm the accuracy, our research group developed a benchmark experimental method focusing on backscattering reaction cross sections. Although neutrons via backscattering reaction were able to be successfully extracted and visualized using an activation detector, it was found that the experimental results did not agree with the calculated results.
In this study, we numerically examined the discrepancy using the MCNP5 code in order to determine the source of the discrepancy and allow for quantification of the neutron backscattered by the benchmark target. As a result, it was found that the cause of the disagreement is due to the modeling of the experimental arrangement. This means the benchmark experiment can correctly estimate the backscattering contribution, even if there are elements in the irradiation room that cannot be modeled precisely, such as an accelerator, as long as no unnecessary elements are arranged in the vicinity of the activation detector.