ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
NRC issues draft EA/FONSI for Duane Arnold restart
Efforts by NextEra Energy to restart the Duane Arnold nuclear power plant as early as 2029 continue to move forward with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's preliminary environmental assessment and determination that the restart would have no significant environmental impacts.
On Thursday, the NRC posted a draft environmental assessment and a finding of no significant impact for the Palo, Iowa, facility; the Federal Register notice was published on Monday. The Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Dominance Financing is a cooperating agency on the draft EA, as the DOE is considering providing financial assistance to the restart project.
Kohki Kumagai, Keitaro Kondo, Satoshi Sato, Saerom Kwon, Kai Masuda
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 82 | Number 4 | May 2026 | Pages 792-804
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2025.2542632
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of shutdown dose rate (SDDR) calculations has been performed for the 1.125-MW high-power beam dump following deuteron beam operations in the linear International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility prototype accelerator (LIPAc). The SDDRs were calculated based on the activation of the beam dump materials caused by nuclear reactions with deuterons and secondary neutrons, which are generated through deuteron interaction in the beam dump.
This study evaluated the SDDR using the actual chemical composition for 5-MeV and 9-MeV deuteron beam operations. The necessity of assessing the SDDR with consideration of the contributions from both deuterons and secondary neutrons has been clarified, as these contributions vary depending on location, deuteron energy, operation time, and cooling times.
The SDDR resulting from Cu(d,x) reactions during 5-MeV deuteron operation decreased relatively quickly with longer cooling times compared to the 9-MeV operation. As the operation time increased, the SDDR tended to decay more slowly due to the increased contribution of long-lived radionuclides. Therefore, the operation scenario must be determined based on the SDDR around the beam dump to ensure safe hands-on maintenance.
Preliminary use of the 5-MeV deuteron beam is considered a preferable method to test the LIPAc’s high-duty–cycle or high-beam–current operation before conducting the 9-MeV deuteron beam operation in order to reduce the SDDR around the beam dump during copper cone hands-on maintenance.