ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
ANS hosts webinar on criticality safety standards
A diagram depicting the NRC’s regulatory structure for nuclear criticality safety. (Image: Oak Ridge National Laboratory)
The American Nuclear Society’s Risk-informed, Performance-based Principles and Policy Committee (RP3C) held another presentation in its monthly Community of Practice (CoP) series last month. RP3C chair Steven Krahn opened the meeting with brief introductory remarks about the importance of risk-informed, performance based (RIPB) decision-making and the need for new approaches to nuclear design that go beyond conventional and deterministic methods.
Hiroshige Kumamaru
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 81 | Number 2 | February 2025 | Pages 161-178
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2024.2352660
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For the design of the liquid-metal blanket in a fusion reactor, numerical calculations have been carried out on liquid-metal magnetohydrodynamic flows in rectangular ducts with sudden contractions. Conservation equations of fluid mass and fluid momentum and the Poisson equation for electrical potential have been solved numerically. The numerical calculations have been conducted for a Hartmann number of ~10 000; a Reynolds number of ~10 000; and contraction ratios (CRs) of 2, 3, and 4. The pressure loss through the contraction has been estimated by the loss coefficient ζ divided by the interaction parameter N, i.e. ζ/N. The loss coefficient ζ/N through the contraction parallel to the magnetic field is much larger than that through the corresponding contraction perpendicular to the magnetic field. The loss coefficient ζ/N increases consistently with the CR and does not change very much with N. While ζ/N also does not change very much with the wall conductance ratio for the contraction parallel to the magnetic field, ζ/N increases gradually with the wall conductance ratio for the contraction perpendicular to the magnetic field.