ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Playing the “bad guy” to enhance next-generation safety
Sometimes, cops and robbers is more than just a kid’s game. At the Department of Energy’s national laboratories, researchers are channeling their inner saboteurs to discover vulnerabilities in next-generation nuclear reactors, making sure that they’re as safe as possible before they’re even constructed.
H. Yamada, K. Ida, S. Murakami, K. Y. Watanabe, E. Ascasibar, R. Brakel, A. Dinklage, J. H. Harris, S. Okamura, F. Sano, U. Stroth, S. Inagaki, K. Tanaka, M. Goto, K. Nishimura, K. Narihara, S. Morita, S. Sakakibara, B. J. Peterson, R. Sakamoto, J. Miyazawa, T. Morisaki, M. Osakabe, K. Toi, N. Tamura, K. Ikeda, K. Yamazaki, K. Kawahata, O. Kaneko, N. Ohyabu, A. Komori, O. Motojima, LHD Experimental Group
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 46 | Number 1 | July 2004 | Pages 82-90
Technical Paper | Stellarators | doi.org/10.13182/FST04-A543
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
New stellarator experiments have been launched since the last compilation of the international stellarator database in 1995. Parameter regimes have been extended by Large Helical Device (LHD), and a variety of improved modes have been found since then. The revision of the international stellarator database has been initiated, driven by these emerging interests and by the requirements for a reactor assessment. Some provisional issues are discussed. An understanding of configurational effects is a prerequisite to the derivation of a unified scaling. Differences in magnetic geometry are influential in characterizing energy confinement. The results from the magnetic axis and elongation scans in LHD are highlighted. Comparison with tokamak confinement is also addressed. The revision of the database is in progress, and this paper is an interim report.