ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Uranium prices are trading at two-month lows
The end-of-March spot price for uranium was $84.25 per pound, according to uranium fuel provider Cameco. This price is down slightly from the $86.95 of a month before, but about $10 lower than the $94.28 spot price at the end of January.
Jeffery F. Latkowski, Javier Sanz, Jasmina L. Vujic
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 30 | Number 3 | December 1996 | Pages 1470-1474
Safety and Environment | doi.org/10.13182/FST96-A11963156
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Inertial fusion energy (IFE) will operate and magnetic fusion energy (MFE) power plants may operate in pulsed modes. The two confinement schemes, however, will have quite different time periods. Typical repetition rates for IFE power plants will be 1-5 Hz. MFE power plants will likely ramp up in current for about 1 hour, shut down for several minutes, and repeat the process. Traditionally, activation calculations for IFE and MFE power plants have assumed continuous operation and used either the “steady-state” (SS) or “equivalent steady-state” (ESS) approximations.1-5 It has been shown, however, that the SS and ESS methods may not yield accurate results for all radionuclides of interest.6 The present work expands that of Sisolak, et al. by applying their formulae to conditions which might be experienced in typical IFE and MFE power plants. In addition, complicated, multi-step reaction/decay chains are analyzed using an upgraded version of the ACAB radionuclide generation/depletion code.7 Our results support previous work in the conclusion that the SS method is suitable for application to MFE power plant conditions.6 We also find that the ESS method generates acceptable results for radionuclides with half-lives more than a factor of three greater than the time between pulses. For components that are subject to 0.05 Hz (or more frequent) irradiation (such as the first wall and coolant), use of the ESS method is recommended. For components or materials that are subject to less frequent irradiation (such as high-Z target materials), pulsed irradiation calculations should be used.