ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
Satoshi Sato, Koichi Maki, Hideyuki Takatsu, Yasushi Seki
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 30 | Number 3 | December 1996 | Pages 1076-1080
Neutronics Experiments and Analyses | doi.org/10.13182/FST96-A11963093
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Shielding analyses for toroidal field coils (TFCs) around the exhaust duct in a nuclear fusion experimental reactor have been performed by two-dimensional discrete ordinate method, and their peak nuclear responses were evaluated. From the results, it was found that the duct wall of about 410 mm thickness was required incase of no shield structure behind the divertor in ordsr to satisfy the radiation limits of TFCs. Taking overestimation due to the analysis model simulating the exhaust duct with a toroidally continuos opening into account, nuclear responses may possibly be lower than the radiation limits by 300 mm thick duct wall. By providing a 480 mm thick shield with 140 mm wide slits behind the divertor, nuclear responses were reduced to about 1/20, and they were equal to or lower than the radiation limits for 200 mm thick duct wall. Also, taking overestimation, nuclear responses may possibly be more than six times lower than the radiation limits for 200 mm thick duct wall.