ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Mikio Enoeda, Yosihiro Ohara, Nicole Roux, Alice Ying, Giovanni Pizza, Siegfried Malang
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 39 | Number 2 | March 2001 | Pages 612-616
Fusion Materials | doi.org/10.13182/FST01-A11963305
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effective thermal conductivity of the pebble beds is one the most important design parameters for pebble bed solid breeder blanket. In the framework of IEA Implementing Agreement on Solid Breeder Subtask Group, measurement of pebble bed thermal conductivity by the hot wire method were defined as one of tasks to provide comparative information on the effective thermal conductivity of candidate ceramic pebble beds for DEMO blanket designs and ITER breeding blanket design. The authors previously reported the preliminary result of the pebble bed thermal conductivity for Li2O, Be and Al2O3. This paper presents the result of Li2TiO3, Li2ZrO3 (1 mm diameter) from CEA, and Li4SiO4 (0.25 - 0.63 mm diameter) from FZK.
Observation was compared to the correlations, SZB model and HM model. Contact area fraction was obtained by correlation fitting, of which the value is 4.9×10−3 for Li2TiO3, Li2ZrO3 (the same value as Li2O) and 1×10−6 for and Li4SiO4.