ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
DOE signs two more OTAs in Reactor Pilot Program
This week, the Department of Energy has finalized two new other transaction agreements (OTAs) with participating companies in its Reactor Pilot Program, which aims to get one or two fast-tracked reactors on line by July 4 of this year. Those companies are Terrestrial Energy and Oklo.
Lester M. Waganer
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 39 | Number 2 | March 2001 | Pages 458-461
Advanced Designs | doi.org/10.13182/FST01-A11963278
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two generic approaches for maintaining commercial fusion power plants are compared to determine the most desirable maintenance scheme and reactor design approach to consider for the next generation, advanced tokamak power plant, the ARIES-AT1. The scheduled and unscheduled maintenance times for the power core of fusion plants are extremely important as they directly determine the plant availability and, ultimately, the cost of electricity. The plant down time is determined by the time to access the failed or worn out part(s), the time to accomplish the replacement, and the time to verify the replacement.
The ARIES-AT power core2 is the design basis for this comparison. One possible maintenance approach is the in-situ removal of moderate-sized modules of individual first wall, blanket, and divertor elements from inside the tokamak power core. This approach potentially allows smaller and lower cost toroidal and poloidal field coils that tightly fit around the outer surface of the power core shield or vacuum vessel. A second approach uses larger toroidal and poloidal field coils that will allow much larger ports to extract a complete, intact sector module of the first wall, blanket, shield, and divertor elements.
The time to access and egress the power core components is largely determined by operations independent of the maintenance approach, such as reactor cool down, draining/filling fluids, unfastening/fastening doors, vacuum leak checks, etc. Replacement time of the core elements was found to significantly favor the modular sector approach because there are fewer and more accessible coolant and structural joints to unfasten and fasten. For the in-situ maintenance approach for ARIES-AT, there are more, but smaller, modules to handle than with the modular sector approach. Verification of the successful refurbishment is a distinct advantage for the modular sector approach because it can be operationally tested in a remote assembly area before being installed. Only a few main coolant connections will be verified within the power core region. For these reasons, the modular sector maintenance approach was adopted for the ARIES-AT conceptual design.