ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
B.V. Robouch (guest), V.I. Volosov, A.A. Ivanov, Yu.A. Tsidulko, L. Ingrosso, J.S. Brzosko
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 35 | Number 1 | January 1999 | Pages 228-232
Oral Presentations | doi.org/10.13182/FST99-A11963857
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The paper briefly recalls the results of previously reported numerical studies on the feasibility of protective neutron shielding of the vital parts of the Fusion Material Irradiation Facility (FMIF) Neutron Source (NS) based on the Novosibirsk Gas Dynamic Trap (GDT). The work stresses the neutronic potentialities of the facility. This mirror-type machine is designed to produce 1018D-T neutrons/s over 10 years (3×1026 neutrons). Simulations use the 3DAMC-VINIA Monte Carlo code with its drizzle-shower splitting technique and two-step cascade (bilinear functional) treatment, ENDF/B6 files, and an engineering design model that precisely reproduces critical parts of the facility. The proposed shielding ensures survival of the facility, as per project tolerances, with further shield reduction and optimization possible. Present partial shield reductions around the plasma column consent 2.5m3 of irradiation space, with 0.06m3 at 0.3×1014 thermonuclear uncollided nDT-neutrons/cm2s (0.5 MW/m2) and 0.7×1014 collided ones, axial damage gradients ⩽l%/cm over 7.8m, and ∼30 dpa in Fe-type materials at end of life.