ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
Winfried Kernbichler
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 20 | Number 4 | December 1991 | Pages 863-867
Magnetic Fusion Reactors/Beam-Driven Systems | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A11946950
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The intrinsic potential of a Field-Reversed Configuration (FRC) for high-β operation – with β-values in the range of 50 to 100% – stimulates much interest in this device as an attractive candidate for a compact fusion reactor with high power density. Several additional benefits, e.g. the cylindrical geometry of the concept, the simplicity of the magnetic system, the simply connected plasma, the low synchrotron radiation, the divertor action of the open field lines and the possibility for direct energy conversion of the charged particle flow, justify a closer look at the benefits and problems of FRCs.
Based on a reference parameter set developed within the international reactor study RUBY [1], the advantages and disadvantages of FRCs are discussed. A steady-state version of an FRC is considered to be more attractive than its pulsed counterpart. Frequent start-up to high temperatures would be particularly detrimental for D-3He with its higher operational requirements (e.g. Ti, nτE, …).