ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
V. Novikov, B. Wahlström
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 20 | Number 4 | December 1991 | Pages 518-523
Overview/Energy Policy | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A11946893
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
It is of vital importance that all lessons from the first phase of nuclear power development are utilized in the planning of emerging nuclear systems. Nuclear power seems to have turned unacceptable in spite of its early promises. The prevailing view among experts is however that the public concerns are possible to approach with technological and institutional solutions. Before this view can be communicated to decision makers and the public it is necessary to learn the lessons from the twenty years of nuclear debate and from the TMI and Chernobyl accidents. The Chernobyl disaster brought the dangers of nuclear power concretely to common people. Increasing concerns for global warming is giving nuclear power a second chance to demonstrate its viability. In utilizing this second chance the industry should take due account of the arguments of the nuclear opposition. Social costs of an accident are very large and an accident anywhere will influence the whole industry. International cooperation is needed in assuring that all safety deficiencies are corrected. Coordinated approaches in informing the public are essential. The safety lessons should be integrated in evolutionary and revolutionary designs for new generations of power plants. The paper concludes with thoughts on how the problems of risk perception and social acceptance of nuclear power could be approached.