ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Smarter waste strategies: Helping deliver on the promise of advanced nuclear
At COP28, held in Dubai in 2023, a clear consensus emerged: Nuclear energy must be a cornerstone of the global clean energy transition. With electricity demand projected to soar as we decarbonize not just power but also industry, transport, and heat, the case for new nuclear is compelling. More than 20 countries committed to tripling global nuclear capacity by 2050. In the United States alone, the Department of Energy forecasts that the country’s current nuclear capacity could more than triple, adding 200 GW of new nuclear to the existing 95 GW by mid-century.
Dai-Kai Sze, The ARIES Team
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 26 | Number 3 | November 1994 | Pages 1061-1068
Fusion Blanket, Shield, and Neutronic Technology | Proceedings of the Eleventh Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy New Orleans, Louisiana June 19-23, 1994 | doi.org/10.13182/FST94-A40295
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of reactor design studies based on the Tokamak configuration have been carried out under the direction of Professor Robert Conn of UCLA. They are called ARIES-I through IV. The key mission of these studies is to evaluate the attractiveness of fusion assuming different degrees of advancement in either physics or engineering development. This paper discusses the directions and conclusions of the blanket and related engineering systems for those design studies. ARIES-I investigated the use of SiC composite as the structural material to increase the blanket temperature and reduce the blanket activation. Li2ZrO3 was used as the breeding material due to its high temperature stability and good tritium recovery characteristics. To reduce the activation caused by the using of Zr, isotopic tailoring is required. Also, W was selected as the divertor target. The activation caused by the Zr and W, even with isotopic tailoring, reduced the safety advantage for the SiC blanket. The ARIES-IV is a modification of ARIES-I. The plasma was in the second stability regime. Li2O was used as the breeding material to remove Zr. A gaseous divertor was used to replace the conventional divertor so that high Z divertor target is not required. We investigated the possibility of breeding without the use of Be. However, tritium self sufficiency could not be assured with the uncertainties in the neutronic data. The safety advantage of ARIES-IV was enhanced by the removal of the high activation materials. The physics of ARIES-II was the same as ARIES-IV. The engineering design of the ARIES-II was based on a self-cooled lithium blanket with a V-alloy as the structural material. Even though it was assumed that the plasma was in the second stability regime, the plasma beta was still rather low (3.4%). To achieve an acceptable neutron wall loading, the magnetic field is rather high. This put an extra burden on a self-cooled liquid metal blanket. It was determined that a self-cooled lithium blanket with bare walls was not acceptable for a reactor with ARIES-II type parameters. Therefore, an insulating coating is required to assure an acceptable design window to reduce the MHD pressure drop. The ARIES-III is an advanced fuel (D-3He) tokamak reactor. The reactor design assumed major advancement on the physics, with a plasma beta of 23.9%. A conventional structural material is acceptable due to the low neutron wall loading. From the radiation damage point of view, the first wall can last the life of the reactor, which is expected to be a major advantage from the engineering design and waste disposal point of view. Organic coolant was selected as the reactor coolant to reduce the operating temperature compared to He, and to reduce the coolant pressure and improve thermal efficiency compared to water. However, the use of organic coolant raised safety and decomposition concerns.