ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
Calvin Wong, E. F. Plechaty, R. W. Bauer, R. C. Haight, L. F. Hansen, R. J. Howerton, T. T. Komoto, J. D. Lee, S. T. Perkins, B. A Pohl
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 8 | Number 1 | July 1985 | Pages 1165-1173
Beryllium Technology | Proceedings of the Sixth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (San Francisco, California, March 3-7, 1985) | doi.org/10.13182/FST85-A39926
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Using the Pulsed-Sphere Method, the leakage spectra from hollow Be spheres of 4.5, 13.8 and 19.9 cm thickness have been measured. The predicted copious production of epithermal and thermal neutrons from the 13.8 and 19.9 cm spherical shells has been verified. A quantitative comparison of measured and calculated time-of-arrival count spectra over the energy range from thermal to ∼ 15 MeV indicates that the ENDL-84 library overestimates the leakage spectra between 2 and 10 MeV and in the epithermal and thermal energy regions. In the remaining regions, the leakage spectra are underestimated. Because of the above compensation the inferred leakage multiplication for the 19.9 cm Be is ∼ 3% higher than calculations. In the case of the 13.8 cm Be, the compensation is less exact and the inferred leakage multiplication is ∼ 9% higher than calculations.