ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
P. Gierszewski (UCLA/CFFTP), M. Abdou (UCLA), G. Bell (TRW), J. Blanchard (UCLA), M. Billone (ANL), J. Garner (TRW), H. Madarame (UCLA/U. Tokyo), G. Orient (UCLA) K. Shin (UCLA/U. Kyoto), K. Taghavi (UCLA), M. Tillack (UCLA)
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 8 | Number 1 | July 1985 | Pages 1100-1108
Nuclear Technology Development Issue and Need (Finesse) | Proceedings of the Sixth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (San Francisco, California, March 3-7, 1985) | doi.org/10.13182/FST85-A39918
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For integrated testing of fusion nuclear components, it is likely that the test device parameters will not match the device parameters of a full scale fusion reactor because of cost constraints. This will result in changes in the behavior of the test module and limit the ability of the test to resolve key nuclear issues. However, it may be possible to modify the test module in order to retain the important aspects of the issues over a range of test device parameters. In order to understand and quantify this range and set requirements for blanket testing, analyses of several aspects of blanket operation were performed. The results suggest that a useful integrated test device should have at least 1 MW/m2 neutron wall load, 0.2 MW/m2 surface heat flux, 20% availability, 500 s burn length, and 0.5 m2 by 0.3 m per test module.