ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE announces NEPA exclusion for advanced reactors
The Department of Energy has announced that it is establishing a categorical exclusion for the application of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures to the authorization, siting, construction, operation, reauthorization, and decommissioning of advanced nuclear reactors.
According to the DOE, this significant change, which goes into effect today, “is based on the experience of DOE and other federal agencies, current technologies, regulatory requirements, and accepted industry practice.”
P. Komarek (compiler), G.L. Kulcinski (compiler)
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 8 | Number 1 | July 1985 | Pages 1075-1080
Nuclear Technology Development Issue and Need (Finesse) | Proceedings of the Sixth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (San Francisco, California, March 3-7, 1985) | doi.org/10.13182/FST85-A39915
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This study considers an “alternate” approach to obtaining the data base required for building a tokamak demonstration reactor (DEMO). The present generation of physics machines (JET, TFTR, T-15, JT-60) is followed by a larger tokamak physics machine (called a NET-P class device) which achieves ignition and perhaps long pulse operation with a D/T-plasma and a respectable neutron wall loading, but with low duty factor and low neutron fluence. In parallel with this machine is a tandem mirror based technology test device (called TASKA class device), which provides high neutron fluence operation with a much smaller plasma volume and fusion power level. It also provides extended neutron testing of blanket modules, materials test samples, neutral beam and RF heating technology, magnets, tritium handling technology, and other components in an integrated facility. Furthermore, fission reactor facilities and simulation test stands would provide additional data. Even though this study is not all-inclusive, some important conclusions may be drawn. Overall, it appears that the “Alternate Plan” could provide the required physics and most of the engineering data for building a DEMO with less risk, in a shorter time, and with perhaps less cost than the present approach of building a single large tokamak aimed at both physics and engineering testing. This conclusion is valid in an overall sense, but some drawbacks remain. The detailed conclusions with respect to the various physics and technology aspects are given in the paper.