ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE announces NEPA exclusion for advanced reactors
The Department of Energy has announced that it is establishing a categorical exclusion for the application of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures to the authorization, siting, construction, operation, reauthorization, and decommissioning of advanced nuclear reactors.
According to the DOE, this significant change, which goes into effect today, “is based on the experience of DOE and other federal agencies, current technologies, regulatory requirements, and accepted industry practice.”
E. L. Alfonso,I. Anteby, D. R. Harding
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 38 | Number 1 | July 2000 | Pages 149-155
Technical Paper | Thirteenth Target Fabrication Specialists’ Meeting | doi.org/10.13182/FST00-A36133
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A thermal model of an OMEGA-scale cryogenic inertial confinement fusion (ICF) target within the layering sphere of the OMEGA Cryogenic Target Positioner was created. A computational fluid dynamics code was used to calculate the temperature profile in the target. The sensitivity of the temperature profiles was modeled for variations in (1) target alignment in the layering sphere, (2) target specifications, and (3) temperature uniformity on the layering sphere’s inner surface. DT-ice non-uniformity in the target was determined by offsetting the center of the ice’s void to a position that minimized the temperature variance of the ice surface. The numerical solutions were compared to analytical solutions when available.