ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
F. Granberg, D. Terentyev, K. O. E. Henriksson, F. Djurabekova, K. Nordlund
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 66 | Number 1 | July-August 2014 | Pages 283-288
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/FST13-728
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Iron carbide (Fe3C), also known as cementite, is present in many steels and has also been seen as nanosized precipitates in steels. We examine the interaction of edge dislocations with nanosized cementite precipitates in Fe by molecular dynamics. The simulations are carried out with a Tersoff-like bond order interatomic potential by Henriksson et al. for Fe-C-Cr systems. Comparing the results obtained with this potential for a defect free Fe system with results from previously used potentials, we find that the potential by Henriksson et al. gives significantly higher values for the critical stress, at least at low temperatures. The explanation was found to be the difference in the core structure of the edge dislocation. The results show that edge dislocations can unpin from cementite precipitates of sizes 1 nm and 2 nm even at a temperature of 1 K, although the stresses needed for this are high. On the other hand, a 4 nm precipitate is not sheared by edge dislocations at low temperatures (≤100 K) on our simulation timescale.