ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Akinori Oda, Yasuyuki Nakao, Takashi Kuitani, Kazuhiko Kudo, Masao Ohta†
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 23 | Number 3 | May 1993 | Pages 267-280
Technical Paper | Plasma Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST93-A30156
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The possibility of passive and active burn stabilization of ignited deuterium-tritium (D-T) tokamak plasmas allowing for radial motion is studied by using a zero-dimensional transport model. Analyses are based on a linear stability method and a nonlinear dynamic simulation. The results are principally given for a self-ignited International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER)-grade plasma. The radial motion has a stabilizing effect in a plasma with ITER89 scaling. It is impractical, however, to expect the radial motion to passively stabilize the burning plasma. A compression-decompression scheme based on regulation of the vertical field sufficiently stabilizes the plasma with ITER89 scaling. This control scheme requires some space for radial motion. The radial space requirement needed to manage a certain temperature perturbation is typically written as δR/R0 ≈ 0.6δT/T0. The allowable magnitude of temperature perturbation is within only 0.5% for δR = 2 cm. The extra space requirement would be the most severe problem in this control scheme. If the fraction GT of alpha-particle power loss due to field ripple is significant, the requirement on radial space might be considerably relaxed. Preliminary calculations have shown that δR/R0 ≈ 0.3δT/T0 might be achievable for GT = 20%.