ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
Laila A. El-Guebaly
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 2128-2132
Blanket Shield and Neutronic | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A30035
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ARIES study investigates the potential of tokamaks as fusion power reactors and focuses on improving the economic and safety features of fusion by integrating the environmental constraints into the design from the beginning. The ARIES-II and ARIES-IV designs incorporate advanced physics and technologies that would be available over the next 5–20 years. The two designs have the same plasma physics but different fusion-power-core designs.1 ARIES-II uses liquid Li as a coolant/breeder with V alloy structure while ARIES-IV employs solid breeder with He coolant and SiC/SiC composite structure. Low activation materials were utilized in the design to reduce the radioactive inventory. A variety of blanket/shield options was examined for both designs and the relative merits of the various materials as a function of blanket/shield thickness were demonstrated. The lifetime of the structural components was determined based on the radiation-induced damage in V and SiC. In this paper, a comparison between the two designs based on detailed neutronics analysis is presented.