ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
K.M. Nikbin, G. A. Webster, N. Mitchell
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 3 | May 1992 | Pages 1905-1908
Magnetic | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29997
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A single rectangular conductor jacket, including the surrounding insulation, has been modelled using finite element computational techniques. Such jackets are typical of the situation in a force flow cooled superconducting coil, where the jacket encloses the current carrying cable and the liquid helium coolant. Elliptical shaped cracks in the jacket have been included in the model to evaluate the stress intensity factors at the crack tip for three crack sizes at three different locations. Results using 3D finite elements are presented for a typical semi-elliptical surface crack in a single conductor jacket under tensile loading. It has been found that mesh and element sizes contribute to the variation in the values of the stress intensity factors calculated but that the relative accuracy of the results is generally within ±5%.