ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Winfried Kernbichler
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 21 | Number 4 | July 1992 | Pages 2297-2306
Technical Paper | Special Issue on D-He Fusion / D-3He/Fusion Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/FST92-A29723
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The intrinsic potential of a field-reversed configuration (FRC) for high-beta operation (beta values in the range of 50 to 100%) stimulates much interest in this device as an attractive candidate for a compact fusion reactor with high power density. Several additional benefits, e.g., the cylindrical geometry of the concept, the simplicity of the magnetic system, the simply connected plasma, the low synchrotron radiation, the divertor action of the open field lines, and the possibility for direct energy conversion of the charged-particle flow, justify a closer look at the benefits and problems of FRCs. The emphasis here is on operation with D-3He fuel under reactor-relevant conditions, whereas deuterium-tritium (D-T) is taken as a reference case. The reasons for that choice are that (a) D-3He offers intrinsic advantages over D-T in neutron production and radioactive inventory and (b) the high-beta regime of an FRC matches ideally some of the requirements for D-3He operation. A steady-state version of an FRC is considered to be more attractive than its pulsed counterpart. Frequent startup to high temperatures would be particularly detrimental for D-3He, where startup scenarios seem to rely either on the transition from D-T to D-3He, with unavoidable strong tritium contamination, or on high-power neutral beam injection.