ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Russia withdraws from 25-year-old weapons-grade plutonium agreement
Russia’s lower house of Parliament, the State Duma, approved a measure to withdraw from a 25-year-old agreement with the United States to cut back on the leftover plutonium from Cold War–era nuclear weapons.
Seng Liek Liew, Long-Poe Ku
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 20 | Number 2 | September 1991 | Pages 164-178
Technical Paper | Shielding | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29687
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Shielding optimization for the Compact Ignition Tokamak baseline test cell building design is performed to minimize the cost. The design is based on iterative calculations using one-dimensional SN models calibrated to the results obtained by coupling a three-dimensional Monte Carlo model to a two-dimensional SN model. These sophisticated models remove most conservative factors in the baseline design. When a low-sodium concrete is used as the base material, the boron concentration and the thicknesses are reduced substantially. The optimal configuration that satisfies all the shielding and structural requirements shows a cost reduction of ∼14% ($4.1 million) relative to the baseline design.