ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
2025: The year in nuclear
As Nuclear News has done since 2022, we have compiled a review of the nuclear news that filled headlines and sparked conversations in the year just completed. Departing from the chronological format of years past, we open with the most impactful news of 2025: a survey of actions and orders of the Trump administration that are reshaping nuclear research, development, deployment, and commercialization. We then highlight some of the top news in nuclear restarts, new reactor testing programs, the fuel supply chain and broader fuel cycle, and more.
Owen N. Jarvis, Edward W. Clipsham, Malcolm A. Hone, Brian J. Laundy, Mario Pillon, Massimo Rapisarda, Guy J. Sadler, Pieter van Belle, Karl A. Verschuur
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 20 | Number 3 | November 1991 | Pages 265-284
Technical Paper | Experiment Device | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29668
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The time dependence of the 2.5-MeV neutron emission from the Joint European Torus (JET) is reliably measured using fission chambers. The absolute calibration of these chambers is required to an accuracy of 10% or better for a range of intensities that may cover six or more decades. At JET, this calibration is now achieved by use of activation techniques, the most convenient of which involves fissionable materials (thorium and uranium) and delayed neutron counting. Because delayed neutron counting is unfamiliar in the fusion community, particular care is taken to obtain confirmation of the results based on this method by comparison with measurements made using the conventional activation procedure (involving indium, nickel, and zinc as target materials). As the activation measurements can be influenced appreciably by the weak emission of 14-MeV neutrons, this contribution is measured separately using high threshold energy activation reactions (in copper and silicon). Neutron transport calculations are employed to relate the measured local fluences of both 2,5- and 14-MeV neutrons to the total yields from the plasma. Absolute calibration accuracies of 6 and 8% are claimed for 2,5- and 14-MeV neutron yields, respectively; the accuracy of the 14-MeV to 2,5-MeV yield ratios is 6%.