ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE-EM issues draft RFP for Hanford lab work, awards WIPP monitoring grant
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management issued a draft request for proposals on June 25 for the Hanford Site’s 222-S Laboratory contract. The 222-S Laboratory is the primary on-site laboratory for analysis of highly radioactive samples in support of all projects at the DOE’s Hanford Site in Washington state.
A. C. Janos, M. Corneliussen. D. K. Owens, M. Ulrickson
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 1806-1810
Impurity Control and Plasma-Facing Component | Proceedings of the Ninth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (Oak Brook, Illinois, October 7-11, 1990) | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29605
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The plasma-facing wall in the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) is covered in large part by a bumper limiter. The limiter extends the full 360° toroidally and ±60° with respect to the midplane on the small-majorradius side. The limiter is the primary power-handling surface of the first wall. The heat-distribution over the two-dimensional surface of the bumper limiter during high-power neutral-beam heated discharges is determined by using a large array of thermocouples distributed around the entire limiter. The heat distribution for normal high-power neutral-beam heated discharges is not very different from that for ohmic discharges. Large variations in heat loading are found, both poloidally and toroidally, even though the limiter was aligned, at the midplane, to within 0.5 mm of a true circle. The heat distribution for discharges which exhibited carbon blooms are compared to otherwise identical discharges which did not show blooms. The heat distribution of a particularly high-power disruptive discharge is examined to determine why recovery from this discharge was difficult.