ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE announces NEPA exclusion for advanced reactors
The Department of Energy has announced that it is establishing a categorical exclusion for the application of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures to the authorization, siting, construction, operation, reauthorization, and decommissioning of advanced nuclear reactors.
According to the DOE, this significant change, which goes into effect today, “is based on the experience of DOE and other federal agencies, current technologies, regulatory requirements, and accepted industry practice.”
A. C. Janos, M. Corneliussen. D. K. Owens, M. Ulrickson
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 1806-1810
Impurity Control and Plasma-Facing Component | Proceedings of the Ninth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (Oak Brook, Illinois, October 7-11, 1990) | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29605
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The plasma-facing wall in the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) is covered in large part by a bumper limiter. The limiter extends the full 360° toroidally and ±60° with respect to the midplane on the small-majorradius side. The limiter is the primary power-handling surface of the first wall. The heat-distribution over the two-dimensional surface of the bumper limiter during high-power neutral-beam heated discharges is determined by using a large array of thermocouples distributed around the entire limiter. The heat distribution for normal high-power neutral-beam heated discharges is not very different from that for ohmic discharges. Large variations in heat loading are found, both poloidally and toroidally, even though the limiter was aligned, at the midplane, to within 0.5 mm of a true circle. The heat distribution for discharges which exhibited carbon blooms are compared to otherwise identical discharges which did not show blooms. The heat distribution of a particularly high-power disruptive discharge is examined to determine why recovery from this discharge was difficult.