ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE-EM issues draft RFP for Hanford lab work, awards WIPP monitoring grant
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management issued a draft request for proposals on June 25 for the Hanford Site’s 222-S Laboratory contract. The 222-S Laboratory is the primary on-site laboratory for analysis of highly radioactive samples in support of all projects at the DOE’s Hanford Site in Washington state.
J. T. Hogan, N. A. Uckan
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 1504-1508
ITER | Proceedings of the Ninth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (Oak Brook, Illinois, October 7-11, 1990) | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29554
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The MHD stability limits to the operational space for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) have been examined with the PEST ideal stability code. Constraints on ITER operation have been examined for the nominal operating scenarios and for possible design variants. Rather than relying on evaluation of a relatively small number of sample cases, the approach has been to construct an approximation to the overall operational space and to compare this with the observed limits in high-β tokamaks. An extensive database with ∼20,000 stability results has been compiled for use by the ITER design team. Results from these studies show that the design values of the Troyon factor (g ∼ 2.5 for ignition studies and g ∼ 3 for the technology phase), which are based on present experiments, are also expected to be attainable for ITER conditions, for which the configuration and wall-stabilization environment differ from those in present experiments. Strongly peaked pressure profiles lead to degraded high-β performance. Values of g ∼ 4 are found for higher safety factor (qψ ≥ 4) than that of the present design (qψ ∼ 3). Profiles with q(0) < 1 are shown to give g ∼ 2.5, if the current density profile provides optimum shear. The overall operational spaces are presented for g-qψ, qψ-li, q-αp, and li-qψ.