ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Keiji Miyazaki, Kensuke Konishi, Yoshihisa Gonno, Shoji Inoue, Masaki Saito
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 969-975
Blanket Technology | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29468
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For reducing the liquid metal MHD pressure drop of the first wall cooling, a NaK experimental study was made on the effects of the electrical insulation of a rectangular duct. Three inner surfaces of a 2.1 mm thick 304-SS rectangular duct of 20.5 mm × 45.5 mm inner cross-section was coated by 1.3 mm thick FRP plates, remaining one of the 45.5 mm wide faces uninsulated to simulate the plasma facing first wall. The magnetic field was mainly applied in parallel to the uninsulated face. The results are summarized as follows. (1) The MHD pressure drop gradient is proportional to the mean flow velocity U and also to the magnetic flux density B. (2) It is about 2.3 times higher than the value predicted by Shercliff's theory for a completely insulated rectangular duct. (3) It is largely reduced, for the same velocity, down to 7.7% at B= 1.0 T and 5.1% at B= 1.5 T in comparison with the uninsulated duct. These results are encouraging for applying to fusion power reactors.