ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
Keiji Miyazaki, Kensuke Konishi, Hiroshi Aoyama, Shoji Inoue, Nobuo Yamaoka
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 19 | Number 3 | May 1991 | Pages 961-968
Blanket Technology | doi.org/10.13182/FST91-A29467
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For reducing the liquid metal MHD pressure drop in the inlet and outlet pipings of a fusion power reactor, the authors proposed a circular duct of electrically insulating function which consists of an outer pipe of metal structure and an inner pipe of insulating ceramics. A basic experiment was made with NaK. The test section which was made of a 25.4 mm O.D. 2.1 mm thick 304-SS pipe and a concentrically inserted 20 mm O.D., 1.0 mm thick FRP pipe with 0.6 mm clearance filled with NaK. The results are quite encouraging as summarized below. (1) The MHD drop gradient is proportional to the flow velocity U and the magnetic flux density B (c.f. B2 for a conducting duct). (2) It is 1.6 times larger than the Shercliff's theory for perfect insulation. (3) It is reduced down to 4.6% at B= 1.0 T and to 3.2% at B= 1.5 T in comparison with the case of uninsulated duct, and to less than 1% if merely extended to B= 5 T or higher.