ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
Robert J. Demyanovich, Scott Lynn
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 12 | Number 3 | November 1987 | Pages 488-501
Technical Paper | Inertial Confinement Fusion | doi.org/10.13182/FST87-A25080
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Process designs were evaluated for the continuous, large-scale generation of singlet delta oxygen for use in a chemical oxygen-iodine laser. The excited singlet oxygen is generated from the chemical reaction of chlorine gas with basic hydrogen peroxide. The chemical reaction also produces a large waste brine stream that can be controlled by recycling through a chlor-alkali cell, which regenerates the reactants Cl2 and NaOH. To prevent deactivation of this excited oxygen, a large excess of hydrogen peroxide is typically used to change the reaction mechanism. This use of excess hydrogen peroxide or nonstoichiometric generation leads to substantial increases in capital and operating costs when compared with theoretical stoichiometric (no excess) generation. For the generation of singlet oxygen at a 500-kW level of equivalent lasing power, a theoretical stoichiometric plant producing all reactants has an estimated capital cost of $38 million. The capital cost for a nonstoichiometric plant is $98 million. Operating costs are $0.68 and $2.12/lb of singlet oxygen, respectively. The energy efficiency of generation is ∼6.3% for the theoretical stoichiometric flow sheet and 3.3% for the nonstoichiometric flow sheet. At this nonstoichiometric efficiency, the use of a chemical oxygen iodine laser for photoneutralization of negative ion beams is probably not competitive with other technologies below a 750-keV neutral beam level.