ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
2025: The year in nuclear
As Nuclear News has done since 2022, we have compiled a review of the nuclear news that filled headlines and sparked conversations in the year just completed. Departing from the chronological format of years past, we open with the most impactful news of 2025: a survey of actions and orders of the Trump administration that are reshaping nuclear research, development, deployment, and commercialization. We then highlight some of the top news in nuclear restarts, new reactor testing programs, the fuel supply chain and broader fuel cycle, and more.
Vijay R. Nargundkar, Tejen Kumar Basu, Om Prakash Joneja
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 12 | Number 3 | November 1987 | Pages 380-394
Technical Paper | Blanket Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST87-A25070
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron multiplication measurements for 14-MeV neutrons were carried out in thick beryllium and graphite assemblies at the Institute for Reactor Development, Jülich, Federal Republic of Germany. Earlier Monte Carlo calculations using the ENDF/B-III library contained systematic errors that did not account for the predominant axial thermalization and non-1/v absorption in polyethylene. In addition, the calculational geometry differed considerably from the experimental geometry. These deficiencies have been eliminated in the present calculations, where the Los Alamos 30-group CLAW-IV library has been used. The anisotropy of the source in space and energy has also been taken into account. The results show that the calculated value of neutron multiplication is 20% higher (originally reported 30% higher) than the measured multiplication in beryllium. The results confirm the measurements made with BeO. For graphite and lead, excellent agreement is found between calculated and measured multiplication.