ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
Vijay R. Nargundkar, Tejen Kumar Basu, Om Prakash Joneja
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 12 | Number 3 | November 1987 | Pages 380-394
Technical Paper | Blanket Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST87-A25070
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron multiplication measurements for 14-MeV neutrons were carried out in thick beryllium and graphite assemblies at the Institute for Reactor Development, Jülich, Federal Republic of Germany. Earlier Monte Carlo calculations using the ENDF/B-III library contained systematic errors that did not account for the predominant axial thermalization and non-1/v absorption in polyethylene. In addition, the calculational geometry differed considerably from the experimental geometry. These deficiencies have been eliminated in the present calculations, where the Los Alamos 30-group CLAW-IV library has been used. The anisotropy of the source in space and energy has also been taken into account. The results show that the calculated value of neutron multiplication is 20% higher (originally reported 30% higher) than the measured multiplication in beryllium. The results confirm the measurements made with BeO. For graphite and lead, excellent agreement is found between calculated and measured multiplication.