ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Mohamed E. Sawan
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 10 | Number 3 | November 1986 | Pages 1483-1488
Fusion Nucleonic | doi.org/10.13182/FST86-A24943
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Geometrical and spectral differences between inertial confinement fusion (ICF) and magnetic confinement fusion (MCF) facilities lead to significant variation of up to ∼ 60% in peak values and profiles of the time averaged blanket nuclear parameters for the same first wall exposure. Simple scaling of radiation effects with neutron wall loading is inappropriate. These effects together with the temporal effects, that result in ∼ 5 to 8 orders of magnitude higher instantaneous reaction rates in the pulsed ICF reactors, lead to significantly different blanket performances in the ICF and MCF reactor environments.