ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
John W. Davis, T. A. Lechtenberg, Dale L. Smith, F. W. Wiffen
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 8 | Number 2 | September 1985 | Pages 1927-1943
Technical Paper | Blanket Comparison and Selection Study | doi.org/10.13182/FST85-A24570
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Blanket Comparison and Selection Study (BCSS) had as its primary goal the selection of a limited number of blanket concepts for fusion power reactors, to serve as the focus for the U.S. Department of Energy blanket research and development program. To help provide a common basis for evaluation of all candidate blanket concepts considered by the BCSS, a structural materials data base assessment was performed that included a compilation of available materials properties data, specification of limiting criteria for materials performance, and determination of design allowable parameters. Three classes of alloys are currently considered as leading candidates for the first-wall/blanket structure of a fusion power reactor. For the BCSS, one reference or baseline alloy was selected from each class and one low-activation counterpart to each reference alloy was identified for evaluation. The alloy classes, reference alloys, and low-activation analogs selected were: austenitic stainless steels (primary candidate alloy; manganese-stabilized steel); ferritic or martensitic steels (HT-9, Fe-11 Cr-2.5 W-0.3 V-0.15 C); and vanadium-base alloys (V-15 Cr-5 Ti, reference alloy is low activation). The critical nuclear, thermophysical, and mechanical properties of the three reference alloys were reviewed. Where insufficient data exist for a reliable assessment, best estimates were provided for use in the blanket concepts development. For the low-activation analogs, the same properties as their respective reference alloys were assumed, including radiation damage resistance. The design stress limits, maximum allowable operating temperature, and lifetime were set primarily by radiation damage considerations. Critical design issues associated with each of the reference alloys and low-activation analogs were identified, together with limiting criteria for materials performance.