ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
2025: The year in nuclear
As Nuclear News has done since 2022, we have compiled a review of the nuclear news that filled headlines and sparked conversations in the year just completed. Departing from the chronological format of years past, we open with the most impactful news of 2025: a survey of actions and orders of the Trump administration that are reshaping nuclear research, development, deployment, and commercialization. We then highlight some of the top news in nuclear restarts, new reactor testing programs, the fuel supply chain and broader fuel cycle, and more.
Magdi Ragheb, Otto Lazareth
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 6 | Number 2 | September 1984 | Pages 195-224
Technical Paper | Blanket Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST84-A23153
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Student's t-distribution is used for the direct estimation of the modeling and geometrical perturbations in the Monte Carlo simulation of fusion blankets. A test of hypothesis is carried out for the equivalence of the means for the reference and perturbed systems at different confidence levels. If the test is failed, intervals for the difference of means or perturbation can be directly deduced. No variance reduction is attempted in the application of this methodology. Application of the methodology to the neutronic and photonic analysis of the conceptual HYFIRE high-temperature process heat fusion reactor blanket is carried out. The use of a two-dimensional model for the analysis versus one-dimensional models leads to differences in the estimated system parameters (e.g., breeding ratio) ranging from 1.5 to 7% at the 70% confidence level. Accounting for the penetrations, using three- versus two-dimensional models, affects those system parameters in the range of 12.8 to 20.9% at the same confidence level. These uncertainties are judged significantly large and need to be accounted for in future reactor designs.