ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
GAIN makes diverse selections for its third round of awards this year
The Department of Energy’s Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear has recently awarded four third-round fiscal year 2026 vouchers to support the development of innovative nuclear technologies. Each company will get access to specific capabilities and expertise in the DOE’s national laboratory complex—in this round of awards Idaho National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Sandia National Laboratories are named—and will be responsible for a minimum 20 percent cost share, which can be an in-kind contribution.
Toshio Ida, Shunsuke Kondo, Yasumasa Togo
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 6 | Number 1 | July 1984 | Pages 64-82
Technical Paper | Shielding | doi.org/10.13182/FST84-A23121
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A numerical analysis program for radiation transport in axisymmetric toroidal geometry AIDA is developed using the method of direct integration (method of characteristics). The shape of the torus cross section is represented by coupled ellipses with different elongations. Several new techniques, such as a ray-tracing technique in the core plasma region and subdivision of angular mesh cells, are introduced to make the method well adapted to the neutronics analysis of a tokamak. These improvements are illustrated by sample toroidal geometry calculations. To verify the validity of the present program, results of analysis for two sample problems are compared with results of DOT-3.5 as well as those of Monte Carlo calculations. Agreement between the results of AIDA and those of DOT-3.5 becomes better as the quadrature approximation used in DOT-3.5 becomes higher. For the same accuracy, the AIDA code requires only about half as much running time as the DOT-3.5 code for a practical natural lithium blanket system.