ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE announces NEPA exclusion for advanced reactors
The Department of Energy has announced that it is establishing a categorical exclusion for the application of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) procedures to the authorization, siting, construction, operation, reauthorization, and decommissioning of advanced nuclear reactors.
According to the DOE, this significant change, which goes into effect today, “is based on the experience of DOE and other federal agencies, current technologies, regulatory requirements, and accepted industry practice.”
Gerardo G. Zavala, Terry Kammash
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 6 | Number 1 | July 1984 | Pages 30-34
Technical Paper | Plasma Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST84-A23117
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
High-speed injection of frozen hydrogen isotope pellets is considered by many to be the most effective method of fueling tokamak plasmas. In the plasma environment the pellet disintegration time could be extremely small, placing stringent requirements on the injection speed and the technology of fuel injection. Several models concerning the composition and spatial extent of the ablation cloud surrounding the pellet have been employed, and they have produced widely varying results for the ablation rate. Most, if not all, of these models have relied on spherical geometry to represent the ablation cloud, although in some instances the effects of the magnetic field on the energy flux reaching the pellet have been taken into account and have resulted in an adjustment of the ablation rate by a “flux reduction factor.” The geometric effects on ablation are examined by assuming the ablation surfaces to also be magnetic flux surfaces. Such an assumption is perhaps most natural for nonspherical geometry especially since there is some basis for it in the experimental observations. It is found that such geometric considerations could lead to sizable reductions in the ablation rate. It is also confirmed that the effects of the magnetic field on the ablation rate are not particularly significant.