ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
Hiroshi Takahashi
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 5 | Number 1 | January 1984 | Pages 72-79
Deep Penetration: Problem and Method of Solution | Special Section Contents / Shielding | doi.org/10.13182/FST84-A23080
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The integral transport method, which has been used in the early calculation of a beam hole tube in an experimental reactor and many reactor parameters of a power reactor; has been reviewed. The Generalized First-Flight Collision Probability (GFFCP) method, based on the integral transport equation, and the discrete ordinates method, based on the differential transport equation, are compared in the context of the deep penetration problem. The direct integral method derived from the partial integral transport equation, which eliminates many of the drawbacks of the GFFCP method, is discussed. A method similar to the GFFCP method, which needs spherical harmonics expansion instead of the discrete ordinates scheme, is presented. The future of these analytical methods is discussed in the comparison with the straight numerical method based on the differential transport calculation and the Monte Carlo calculation.