ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Alex Wekhof, Richard R. Smith, Sidney S. Medley
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 3 | Number 3 | May 1983 | Pages 462-470
Technical Note | Plasma Heating System | doi.org/10.13182/FST83-A20868
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The peak energy, energy broadening, and neutral current fractions for the E, E/2, and E/3 energy components of the prototype Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor 120-keV deuterium neutral beam source were measured on the Neutral Beam System Test Facility at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory using a 127-deg swept electrostatic energy analyzer provided by the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. The results were compared with Doppler shift spectroscopy measurements, taking into account the different geometrical factors for both methods. The average neutral current fractions for the E, E/2, and E/3 atomic species components measured with the electrostatic analyzer and extrapolated to the target area were 0.35, 0.47, and 0.18, respectively, which agreed with the spectroscopic results to within 5%. For all species, a 1/e full-width energy broadening of ∆.E/E ≅ 4% was observed for an analyzer energy resolution of both ∼4 and 1%. This width is not in contradiction with the energy broadening expected due to Franck-Condon dissociation effects. The peak energies for the E, E/2, and E/3 components were within ∼4% of the rated values, but consistently on the low side of the standard deviation.