ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Shifting the paradigm of supply chain
Chad Wolf
When I began my nuclear career, I was coached up in the nuclear energy culture of the day to “run silent, run deep,” a mindset rooted in the U.S. Navy’s submarine philosophy. That was the norm—until Fukushima.
The nuclear renaissance that many had envisioned hit a wall. The focus shifted from expansion to survival. Many utility communications efforts pivoted from silence to broadcast, showcasing nuclear energy’s elegance and reliability. Nevertheless, despite being clean baseload 24/7 power that delivered a 90 percent capacity factor or higher, nuclear energy was painted as risky and expensive (alongside energy policies and incentives that favored renewables).
Economics became a driving force threatening to shutter nuclear power. The Delivering the Nuclear Promise initiative launched in 2015 challenged the industry to sustain high performance yet cut costs by up to 30 percent.
Magdi M. H. Ragheb, Andrew C. Klein, Charles W. Maynard
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 1 | Number 1 | January 1981 | Pages 99-119
Technical Paper | Fusion | doi.org/10.13182/FST81-A19919
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Three-dimensional Monte Carlo neutronics calculations for the last mirror-beam duct system for a laser-driven fusion power reactor conceptual design, where a three-section duct with focusing mirrors and right angle bends for the last two beam reflections is modeled. The estimate of neutron leakage flux after the second beam reflection is on the order of 1014 n/(m2⋅s). Even though less in magnitude than the flux at the end point of neutral beam injectors in tokamak designs, reported in the range of 1017 n/(m2⋅s), this still leads to a neutron dose rate of 106 remjh after the second beam bend. Since space is not at a premium as in the case of magnet shields for magnetic confinement systems, minimum-cost lead mortar or concrete can be used as shielding materials instead of other minimum-thickness costly materials. An energy leakage rate of 4.6 MW of 14-MeV neutrons per beam precludes the use of concrete behind the last mirror, suggesting the use of a secondary blanket composed of a lead acetate solution with immersed Boral (Al + B4C) sheets. Boral as a penetration shielding material is found to reduce the thermal group flux around the penetration by two to three orders of magnitude, compared to aluminum, and is recommended as a duct lining material for both inertial and magnetic fusion systems. Neutron heating rates and radiation damage parameters for the duct liner compare to those at the front face of the last mirror and first wall, and will require similar elaborate thermal-hydraulic and mechanical designs.