ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Uranium prices steady as EIA releases annual market report
The end-of-July spot price for uranium was $86.36 per pound, as reported by Cameco—roughly the same as it has been since February. Analytics firm Trading Economics reported a uranium futures price of $86.60 per pound, a figure that also has been holding steady since early April.
These updates come as the U.S. Energy Information Administration has released its 2025 Uranium Marketing Annual Report, which examines in detail multiple aspects of the U.S. uranium market. Data are derived from answers given in the Uranium Marketing Annual Survey, which collects information on contracts, deliveries (during the past year and projected for the next 10 years), purchased enrichment services, inventories, fuel assembly usage, and market requirements.
Jonathan W. Morrow-Jones*, Marc A. Firestone, Tak Kuen Mau
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 32 | Number 4 | December 1997 | Pages 526-544
Technical Paper | Special Section: Plasma Control Issues for Tokamaks / Instrumentation Control and Data Handling | doi.org/10.13182/FST97-A19903
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The modeling steps needed to create dynamically based automated control of tokamak plasmas are traced. This involves integrating models of current/magnetic-flux dynamics; plasma transport; plasma geometry; and source terms, such as lower hybrid, fast wave, and pellet-fueling deposition. Perturbative analysis of these models then yields the linear response of the tokamak to changes in coil voltages, applied radio-frequency power, or pellet-firing frequency. Comparison of the linear response models to nonlinear numerical calculations reveals that the plasma position and shape modeling will require future refinements.